Rugged independence. The unconventional life. That's the promise of a popular cigarette brand. All lies, of course.
How independent are you when you can't get through a day (or an hour) without sucking on a cancer stick? Smoking, as portrayed by the tobacco industry, looks like a lifestyle choice. Dead wrong. It's an addiction, the very opposite of independence. If you want control of your life and health, rebel against tobacco.
- A Canadian study found that to recruit new smokers, brand images communicated independence, freedom, and peer acceptance.
- An RJ Reynolds document attributed the success of Phillip Morris' Marlboro to brand communications that were "�in tune with younger adult smokers' enduring want to express their maturity and independence through smoking."
- As much as a third of all youth who experiment with smoking do so because of effective tobacco industry marketing.
On August 17, 2006, U.S. District Judge Gladys Kesseler issued a federal opinion in the federal government's lawsuit against major tobacco companies. It was found that the tobacco companies (the defendants):
- violated civil racketeering laws.
- defrauded the American public by lying over decades about the health risks of tobacco.
- did market to children.
- continue to deceive the public by "recruiting new smokers (the majority of whom are under the age of 18), preventing current smokers from quitting, and thereby sustaining the industry."
"Defendants have marketed and sold their lethal products with zeal, with deception, with a single-minded focus on their financial success, and without regard for the human tragedy of social costs that success exacted."
- U.S. District Judge Gladys Kesseler